Parshat Ekev
Posted by Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld on August 8, 2007 | Tags: Ekev
The concept of teshuvah, repentance, is a given in traditional Jewish circles: One who sins before God has the inalienable right to repent and to be absolved. Nevertheless, an analysis of the Torah indicates that such a theology might be absent from the text.
In this week’s portion, Ekev, Moses recounts the sin of the Golden Calf and God’s subsequent threat to destroy the Israelites. Moses tells how he threw himself before God, and how as a result “God listened” to him. Exodus’ account of this sin relates that “God refrained from doing evil (32:14).
Nowhere in these two passages does it state explicitly that God forgave the Israelites. The words “God listened” are ambiguous, and the phrase “God refrained from doing evil,” does not mean that God refrained from carrying out justice. Indeed, at the end of the Exodus’ account, the text adds that God “struck the people with a plague because of the calf that Aaron had made.” The very fact that God visited a plague upon his people shows that he did not grant complete forgiveness.
Furthermore, God’s ambiguous words in the context of the Golden Calf contrast sharply with his response to the sin of the spies, when he threatens to destroy the Israelites. This time Moses cries out words usually taken as the prooftext for the biblical notion of repentance (Numbers 14: 18): “God is slow to anger, great in love and carries sin and rebellion. He does not cleanse but keeps in mind the sins of the fathers for their children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.”
This time God’s response appears absolute (Numbers 14: 20): “God said, ‘I will grant forgiveness according to your words.’” However, here too, even as he utters these forgiving words, he punishes the Israelites, informing them that they will be forced to wander for 40 years and will not enter the land of Israel.
Moses’ words, recited almost as a mantra by Jews everywhere on Yom Kippur as a symbol of God’s generous and forgiving nature, are interpreted in almost the reverse fashion by the medieval scholar Chezkuni (France, 12th c.). Commenting on the phrase, “according to your words”, Chezkuni writes: “Just as you said I should do, I will do exactly. You said, ‘slow to anger,’ indeed I will lengthen my anger upon them, and I will not destroy them at this exact moment. You said ‘carries sin,’ indeed they will carry their sins. You said, ‘He does not cleanse,’ indeed I shall not absolve them. You said, ‘He remembers the sins of the fathers upon their children,’ so shall I do. I will leave the children in the desert with their fathers for forty years. And the children shall carry the sins of their parents as they will not immediately enter the land of Israel.”
In the Torah, it seems, God grants complete forgiveness only for inadvertent sins. Numbers 15: 26, states: “Since all the people acted without knowledge, the entire Israelite community…shall thus be forgiven.” When the people act “without knowledge” they may be forgiven with the proper ritualistic offering. However, were one to commit a purposeful sin, like the idolater in Numbers 15: 20 or the wood gatherer in Numbers 15: 32, then there is no room for forgiveness.
If the God of the Torah never grants absolute forgiveness for an intentional sin, then how is it that the notion of teshuvah stands today as one of the axioms of Judaism? The idea of God abandoning a punishment appears in the book of Jonah where God allows the people of Ninveh to repent and be absolved.
This explains why Jonah famously resisted God’s initial command. How could the same God who never once granted absolute forgiveness now grant a total pardon to this foreign nation? Abraham Joshua Heschel explains that in Ninveh, God was teaching Jonah that “beyond justice and anger lies the mystery of compassion.” This notion of the “mystery of compassion” appears to have originated in God’s interactions with the people of Ninveh.
Throughout the centuries, the rabbis ignored the Torah’s message that God does not forgive completely and latched onto the Book of Jonah as evidence of the opposite. It seems that the Book of Jonah is God’s final teaching on this matter. In contrast to the Torah, Jonah allows for forgiveness without physical punishment. God does allow one to completely wipe the slate clean.
|
Rabbi Shmuel HerzfeldJoined: August 8, 2007 Shmuel is Rabbi of Ohev Sholom -- The National Synagogue, the oldest Orthodox synagogue in Washington, DC. His communal responsibilities include teaching classes, coordinating adult education, creating programs for the elderly,the youth, and the sick, and ministering to the pastoral needs of the... Divrei Torah (30) |
